The Ultimate Computer: is it necessary?

http://www.kurzweilai.net/3m-and-ibm-to-develop-new-types-of-adhesives-to-create-3d-semiconductors


The above link contains a video and explanation of a new innovation that is in production by the companies IBM and 3M. The idea seems is that they will create a silicon substance that will allow them to stack computer chips together, creating an even faster microprocessor for today's computers. This could make computers 1000 times faster than they are now.


This is a good example of how new technology leads to more technology. The technology to develop the silicon layers for the chips has now led to a super computer. This seems like a good idea for large companies who use a large network which can be slowed down when hundreds of people are using the same connection. But why would anyone need a PC that has a microprocessor that is any faster than they are today? In my opinion this technology is not necessary. Computers are already fast enough for personal use. This would be a waste of time and money that IBM and 3M could be spending on something that could better benefit our society.

I'll be back,

Terminator

Star Trek and the Ultimate Computer

Ihde repeatedly says that people see technology in two ways: they want the convenience technology provides, but they are afraid that technology might start to control them. This contrast is evident in the Star Trek episode. Daystrom has good intentions in building M5, allowing ships to run fairly autonomous, resulting in less people being in danger. Kirk worried that he would lose his job to the "ultimate computer". The computer ends up taking over the Enterprise, realizing many people's fears.

Unrelated, I found a funny Star Trek picture.