In our reading,
Turkle explores the effects of relational technologies that range
from Furbies, to Nexi, and on to robots as romantic partners. One
would think that the reaction to these robots would be negative,
especially in terms of a romantic partner. However, it seems that
humans are eager to find a partner to relate to, perhaps beginning
with the innocent toy for a child. She explores how the Furby appears
to be like a doll, except that instead of attaching through the
psychology of projection, there is a “give-and-take”
relationship. It is in this way that we as relational creatures form
“relationships” with our machines. This is similar to the story
in Robot Stories where a couple must learn to take care of a robot
child before they are allowed to have a real one. The purpose of this
is to practice parenting in order to prevent dysfunctional families.
However, it is not the same as a real child. In contrast to Turkle,
the message in “My Robot Baby” says that a mother would not
be able to care for a robot child the way she would for a real one.
Not only is there a biological bond missing, but it is not made of
real flesh and blood. The robot's favoritism towards the father is
quite an exaggeration; usually an infant would more readily attach to
its mother, and therefore, a mother to her child. It is impossible
for a woman to attach to a robot in the same way that she would
attach to her own baby. Even though people may seem very eager to
attach to their machines, I do not think that it is the same dynamic
relationship which is possible between two human beings.
No comments:
Post a Comment